Ravens Roundtable

Followers

ShakedownSports.com

Baltimore Ravens Ticket - Sports News & Rumors

Monday, September 13, 2010

Not just opposing QB's target the Ravens' secondary


Whenever the Ravens have been analyzed as a potential Super Bowl contender by the national media, the secondary has come under fire for potentially holding the team back from success.

From afar, the skepticism by media personalities such as Peter King and Marshall Faulk, among others, makes sense. After all, what they see from the outside is a secondary that gave up big plays a year ago and has lost starters Ed Reed and Dominique Foxworth from a year ago. They also have two cornerbacks coming back from ACL injuries.

However, a closer examination would reveal that this secondary did not perform nearly as poorly as observers would have you believe, and they have improved in quality and talent across the board.

Let's start with the misconception that the back end was consistently a problem spot in '09. The reality is that the secondary did give up big pass plays during the first half of the season, specifically through the Minnesota game. A closer look would show that after the bye week, Greg Mattison made some changes with the coverages and the defensive backs got better with their technique.

The proof of this improvement came from better play by Foxworth and Chris Carr. Both players gave up fewer plays downfield. Taking it a step further, in the last 12 games of the season, including the playoffs, the defense did not give up 300 yards to an opposing quarterback. In that stretch they faced Peyton Manning (twice), Ben Roethlisberger, Aaron Rodgers, Carson Palmer, and Tom Brady.

Now, after the injuries to Fabian Washington and Lardarius Webb, the Ravens were down to Chris Carr as a starter and Frank Walker as the primary nickleback. Yet, they still survived thanks to marked improvement from the deep coverage of the safeties. With Reed out of the lineup for four games, the defense as a whole gave up fewer home runs in the passing game. The safeties stayed true to their landmarks.

Even with the loss of Reed and Foxworth, the group is clearly deeper than the year before. Carr -- who was arguably the most improved player from the beginning of the year to the end -- may remain a starter alongside Washington, but only until Webb is up to speed. The addition of Josh Wilson gives the team another proven starter as well, so Carr may eventually fall to his intended spot as a dimeback -- the spot that Frank Walker and Corey Ivy occupied a year ago.

In fact, even Cary Williams would be a much better fit than Walker and Ivy in that role, and he is fifth on the depth chart. At safety, the return of Haruki Nakamura could be the sleeper addition of the season. Nakamura brings flashes of the game-changing ability that Reed boasts. He looks healthy and closes on the ball in a hurry.

Along with Tom Zbikowski and Dawan Landry, this group should be better in deep support than people realize. All three players have good closing speed and more importantly, they have played with tremendous discipline throughout the preseason. In the event that the young guys take a step backward, the team does have veteran Ken Hamlin as insurance.

The secondary will be better than people expect.

The bigger question mark remains the Baltimore pass rush.

Friday, May 28, 2010

New York/New Jersey...is that even a place?


NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell announced this week that the new Giants/Jets stadium would host the Super Bowl in 2014 in New York/New Jersey.

Just for fun I Googled "New York New Jersey" and here's what came up: a little arrow pointing to Manhattan. The place read, "New York, NY (near New Jersey)." When I Google "Meadowlands Sports Complex," it points me to the actual place in New Jersey where the Giants and Jets play.

My point? Stop throwing "New York" in the title just to make it sound good. This kind of branding drives me nuts. And yes, I threw a hissy fit like a two-year-old when the Anaheim Angels changed their name to the "Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim." Give me a freaking break.

But on to the larger sports biz issue here and that's the fact that we're going to have our first cold weather Super Bowl in decades. This winter I posted a FF poll asking if we should have a cold weather Super Bowl and the resounding response was "yes!!" So ask and ye shall (eventually) receive.

Depending on the teams, weather could play an important factor in the game. But it'll also play an important factor on who comes to the Super Bowl. Tampa Bay, Fla. and New Orleans make for great vacation spots in the dead of winter for anyone -- football fan or not. But take away a nice break from the winter cold (global warming aside) and you'll likely get a different fan base in the Meadowlands for this one.

For one, it'll allow the more hard core football fans a chance at the tickets if they can afford it. I wouldn't worry about a lack of demand here either -- cold weather or not, the Super Bowl always sells out. Depending on how sales are going, ticket prices may drop in the weeks leading up but there won't be an empty seat in the house come kickoff time.

So what could more traditional football fans mean for the 2014 Super Bowl? Potentially less ancilliary spending, according to ESPN's Peter Keating. For one, the Meadowland is NOT IN NEW YORK, as I subtly noted above, so it folks want to round out their experience with a Broadway show, they'll have to hoof it into the city. For the heartier folk, that may not be an issue. But for cold weather ninnys like myself or for those who have traditionally gone to the Super Bowl just to go, that may be too daunting a task to be worth it.

Of course on the bright side the new stadium will finally get a naming rights sponsor as companies will want to hurry to slap their name on the side of a stadium that will be featured in one of the most-watched events of the year. But for the local economy that doesn't make much of a difference.

Finally, I have to give the NFL major props for having the guts to bring the Super Bowl to a cold weather environment. It's a big risk -- it's sure to be one of the top talking points and will be part of the fabric of the game either way you slice it.

Either way, it'll make the game more interesting (as if it needs that) and I hope the gamble pays off. Mostly because if a Super Bowl could work in New Jersey, than one would certainly work in Baltimore, Green Bay, Foxborough and other cities deserving of hosting a Super Bowl.

Liz Farmer covers sports business for The Daily Record in Baltimore. You can also visit her at her web site, Farmer's Field to read more about the business of sports.

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Here's how you pick the host city for the Super Bowl


Let’s get back to the real NFL.

The team with best record gets the Super Bowl.

The NY 2014 announcement has opened the door to allow the league to come full circle from its roots. This will eliminate any concern about teams throwing games at the end of the year and allow the NFL to concentrate on more important stuff like helping the older vets.

Can you imagine the vibe in a city awarded the Super Bowl for the first time?

The cool thing is no one will know what city will host until the results of the championship games are in.

It’s time the NFL does things the right way.



Photo by Kevin Moore.


Wednesday, May 26, 2010

YOU DON'T KNOW JACK


Ahhhhh…..it’s that time of year again!

What time is that, you ask? Time to break out the grill?

Nope!

Time to head downy oshin hun?

No, not that either.

It’s the time of year that makes me laugh and cringe all at the same time….the time of year when the NFL draft is over and camp and preseason are yet so far away….time for all those football player wannabes and “experts” to troll every imaginable football forum and voice their “expert” opinions on everything from trade values to player injuries and everything in between.

The comments on these forums are indeed entertaining but always leave me thinking, “what in the hell do they know??!!” What?? What the media reports? Whatever PC gibberish is contained in team statements? Puh-LEASE people! I hate to burst your “I know everything about all injuries, what players think and feel and how much gas they have left in the tank” bubbles….but the fact of the matter is, you don’t really know jack.

In making this statement, I am of course assuming that you, unlike me, have no connection to these athletes other than being a fan, attending games and garnering all of your “knowledge” from the good ole internet.

I am new to the blogging shtick ….so let me tell you a little about myself and how I really do know what y’all pretend to know.

First, let me say, I’m not here to rip you for being an armchair quarterback. I’m not even going to laugh about you turning internet speculation into absolute fact. No, I, friends, am here to help you – to give you a glimpse of the player…not from on the field or even inside the locker room, but from inside their lives.

You see, they have let me in – into their families and their worlds and trust, me it is not anything close to what you have imagined, speculated on or have become an “expert” about.

Occasionally, I’ll convey to a certain athlete what people are blogging and commenting on. Not only do they look at me like I have two heads, but most laugh hysterically. They don’t get upset at what’s written about them, their families, their attitudes or their injuries….because it’s so far from the truth that it’s a joke.

Tell Willis McGahee that he doesn’t care and he will explode with laughter. Why? Because that is so far gone from reality. The truth is, McGahee has more “care” about football, the community and his teammates in his pinky finger than many of us have within our entire being.

Tell Brian Westbrook he has no gas left in the tank. HA! Really? You know because you’re with him every day, right? You see him at the gym during the off season while you are doing your offseason training.

Tell Ed Reed or Ray Lewis that they are too old. Tell them you “KNOW” this to be a fact because the statistics you love to regurgitate from the internet say so.

I have seen fan emails where fans will actually tell a player what they should or should not do.

Really?!

And yet, rather than making it big as a NFL player or coach or ESPN analyst, there you sit, behind your keyboard with those big cyber muscles.

Friends, before you decide to preach your opinions as if they are facts, argue with friends or on message boards as if any of you REALLY know, please remember it’s just for entertainment.

It’s not a competition of who “knows” more than the next person because what I KNOW is that most of you really KNOW NOTHING AT ALL!

Friday, May 21, 2010

Is lingerie football just good marketing?


I can’t help it, I’ve got to chime in on this one. There’s been a lot of chatter over the airwaves, in print and around the water cooler about the Baltimore Charm, the city’s new lingerie football team that held auditions this month.


The basic question is, is women playing football in their underwear exploitation? Or is it just good marketing? The Charm will be the newest team in the 10-team Lingerie Football League, which has teams like the Dallas Desire and the San Diego Seduction. The league bills itself as “true fantasy football.”


Gotta give them credit for just putting it out there — league organizers know what sells tickets.

And it seems as if the women trying out for the squad are perfectly willing to buy into this image. After all they know the deal going in and no one’s forcing them to strip down to their undies and run around like Pamela Anderson did for Baywatch in the 1990s. (It should be noted that the women do wear pads … but they’re neatly positioned so as not to take away from the main attraction.)


So if the players are OK with it, should we be making a fuss? After all, it’s been pointed out that women’s beach volleyball players are just as scantily clad — and they’re on NBC on a regular basis (not to mention the Pro Beach East Women’s Volleyball Tournament held May 15 at the Preakness Infield Fest).


But there is a difference. In beach volleyball, two-piece bathing suits are the uniform. And it’s the same for the men (although some do cheat by wearing sleeveless t-shirts with their shorts, but you get my point). Here, the difference in uniforms is almost the whole point. The league’s coaches and organizers may say fans are drawn in by the lingerie at first but come back for the football, but just one look at the league’s homepage and it’s clear what this is about.


But again, I wonder — should we care? An interesting note is that this league says it is profitable. Would it still be profitable if it was just women playing football? Maybe that’s a question for the Independent Women’s Football League, which I’ll note, I’d never heard of until five minutes ago when I did a Google search.

If women want to make some extra money running around playing football in their underwear, and if people want to buy tickets to watch, should we stand in judgment? Or should we applaud them for finding a business model and a marketing angle that seems to be working?





Liz Farmer covers sports business for The Daily Record in Baltimore. You can also visit her at her web site, Farmer's Field to read more about the business of sports.

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Being Mel Kiper


When NFL draft analyst Mel Kiper Jr. began working with ESPN back in 1984, neither one remotely resembled the powerhouses they are today.

Just a few years prior, in 1981, Kiper made his draft report public, punching it out on a typewriter and selling 550 copies. Meanwhile, ESPN was still a fledgling sports network, just five years old.

“The NFL wasn’t king of all sports back in those days,” said Kiper, 49. “They were doing the draft on a Tuesday morning. Now the draft has become a huge event with television coverage on every pick and it’s broadcast at night so people can watch.”

As much as the draft’s popularity has grown, so has Kiper’s Baldwin-based business, Mel Kiper Enterprises Inc. Over the last three decades, Kiper has become the face of a massive draft empire complete with radio shows, television appearances, Web sites and publications.

But with popularity comes competition.

It started in 1979, when a then-19-year-old Mel Kiper typed up his first draft report and mailed copies to about 150 agents, scouts and team personnel. Kiper would spend hours on the phone with coaches and convinced his father to install a satellite dish in the backyard of their Dundalk home so he could watch college football games from all across the country.

He repeated the effort the following year, and with the help of Mel Kiper Sr., founded Mel Kiper Enterprises in 1981 and began charging for his service.

Over the years Kiper has added a draft preview report, free agency review sheet and a draft review report to his publications. Many say his early relationship with ESPN gave him the exposure he needed to grow his brand while monopolizing the industry.
“For a long time Mel was it — he was the professor,” said Steve Dresner, a producer for ESPN in the late 1980s who now works for the NFL Network.

And during that time, Kiper’s recognition as the go-to draft analyst blossomed as the NFL draft grew into one of the most anticipated football events of the year.

“Years ago in the industry, once the Pro Bowl was done, you would not really need to pay attention to the NFL much before training camp because the draft was one of those ‘ho hum’ things,” Dresner said. “[Now it’s] one of the most-talked about, made-for-TV events other than the Super Bowl.”

Kiper Sr. helped manage the business and died in 1988, shortly before Mel started dating Kim. After their marriage in 1989, Kim stepped in to run Kiper Enterprises.
“During the 1989 draft, right after we got married, there was a running joke that they were betting on how long we would stay married,” Mel Kiper said. “The over-under was 1½ years, and everyone was taking the under.”

Under Kim Kiper’s direction, Kiper Enterprises launched a Web site, computerized its customer database and streamlined production. Whereas Mel is the face — and hair — of the business, Kim is the one who has brought it into the 21st century.

“He was still on the typewriter the year we met,” said Kim Kiper, 45. “And he just started e-mailing four years ago.”

Kiper’s print publications range from $9 for the free-agency sheet to $27.95 for the draft report. Kim said she now fills about 10,000 orders every year.

While the first 10 years were about streamlining the business, the last 10 have been about adapting to new technology.

“The Internet came along, and just like any print media, [it] cut into our database because you could get everything for free,” she said. “I did see a change at that point in time.”

This year she added PDFs, allowing people to download reports off the Web site for a few dollars off the print price.

“I really feel like that’s going to be the wave of the future,” she said.
And largely because of the Internet, Kiper Enterprises also had to face something else new: competition.

“The Internet has been bigger than anything else,” said David Cope, a former marketing director for the Baltimore Ravens and Washington Redskins who is now senior vice president of business development for Major League Soccer’s D.C. United. “It disseminates information so quickly to so many people it’s allowed people to become closer to the NFL and to learn more about players and teams.”

With easier access to statistics, the growing popularity of college football on television and the ability to publish online, it’s become easier in the last decade to be the next Mel Kiper. The NFL Network’s Mike Mayock, CBS Sportsline’s Rob Rang, Fox Sports’ Chris Steuber are just a few of the competing network’s draft gurus. Even ESPN has brought on Todd McShay as an additional analyst.

MORE HERE
Liz Farmer covers sports business for The Daily Record in Baltimore. You can also visit her at her Web site, http://www.farmersfieldonline.com to read more about the business of sports.

Pryce pays price, takes pay cut to secure roster spot


Midway through the 2009 season, DE Trevor Pryce was removed from the starting line-up and saw his playing time cut. Now, it appears that Pryce’s salary has been cut too.

NFLPA records indicate that the Ravens and Pryce have recently agreed to a reduction in Pryce’s scheduled base salary of $4.5M. Pryce is now slated to make only $2M in base salary for 2010. It is likely that Pryce agreed to the reduced salary in order to remain with the team.

Had there been a Salary Cap in 2010, Pryce most certainly would have been released in early March. However, without a Salary Cap, Pryce, who will turn 35 in August, was able to remain with the club, but his sizeable base salary still made his roster spot vulnerable. Now, it appears that Pryce will remain with the club at a more favorable salary for the role that he is expected to fill.

Despite the reduced playing time in 2009, Pryce thrived in the role of a situational pass rusher and still led the team with 6.5 sacks. It is a role that Pryce is expected to again fill in 2010 and it is likely that the reduction in his base salary is offset with incentives that would allow Pryce to recoup part if not all, of the $2.5M that he has given up if he meets certain statistical milestones.

Blog Archive